The World in Time

Geoffrey Wheatcroft

Friday, December 03, 2021

Totes Meer (Dead Sea), by Paul Nash, c. 1940. Photograph © Tate (CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0).

“About twenty years ago,” the historian Geoffrey Wheatcroft says on the latest episode of The World in Time, “Umberto Eco said he was amused by a survey in which a quarter of British schoolchildren thought that Winston Churchill was a fictional character. But in fact in a way that is what he has become. He has become something outside conventional history. This is demonstrated by his portrayal in popular culture. It dawned on me in recent years: if you go to a movie called Lincoln, it will be hero-worshipping, and respectful in the Spielberg manner, but it will stick quite close to historical fact. But if you go to a movie called Churchill…or Darkest Hour…they are complete travesties that bear no resemblance whatsoever to historical fact. And nobody minds.”

 

Lewis H. Lapham speaks with Geoffrey Wheatcroft, author of Churchill’s Shadow: The Life and Afterlife of Winston Churchill.

 

Thanks to our generous donors. Lead support for this podcast has been provided by Elizabeth “Lisette” Prince. Additional support was provided by James J. “Jimmy” Coleman Jr.

Discussed in this episode

More Podcasts

June 14, 2019

The World in Time:

David Wallace-Wells

Lewis H. Lapham talks with the author of The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming. More

April 05, 2019

The World in Time:

Philipp Blom

Lewis H. Lapham talks with Philipp Blom, author of Nature’s Mutiny: How the Little Ice Age of the Long Seventeenth Century Transformed the West and Shaped the Present. More

June 28, 2019

The World in Time:

Rick Atkinson

Lewis H. Lapham talks with the author of The British Are Coming: The War for America, Lexington to Princeton, 1775–1777. More

July 07, 2017

The World in Time:

Erica Benner

Lewis H. Lapham talks to Erica Benner, author of Be Like the Fox: Machiavelli in His World. More

June 14, 2025

The World in Time:

Episode 2: Lewis H. Lapham, Part Two

“Lewis understood that without the past, we lose the ability to think productively or even understand the present.” More